Professor Mary Ann Glendon is pictured in a 2009 file photo in Washington. CNS photo/Paul Haring
RANDOLPH -- Despite some recent setbacks, the pro-life movement has gained ground in the place it matters most -- the hearts and minds of the American people, Mary Ann Glendon, professor of law at Harvard, told those gathered at Massachusetts Citizens for Life's (MCFL) annual fundraising banquet on Oct. 19.
The most recent polls show that an unmistakable (if slight) majority of Americans are pro-life and that the large majority, 75 percent, are opposed to abortions for 95 percent of the reasons they are performed, said Glendon, who served as the U.S. ambassador to the Vatican from 2008-2009.
This year's banquet, held at the Lantana in Randolph, marks the beginning of MCFL's 40th year. Glendon called the current pro-life challenges "more sinister" than founders of MCFL ever dreamed possible.
In Massachusetts, the biggest challenges are the possible legalization of physician assisted suicide and the destruction of human embryos for research, which receives state funding. In the case of both, advocates use the same rhetoric as pro-abortion lobbyists. They call for "choice" and "compassion," and they often highlight cases of unusual hardship, she said.
She said just as "abortion for health reasons soon became abortion on demand," the weak safeguards that accompany assisted suicide laws disappear rapidly. In the Netherlands, there are now mobile units that administer deadly poison. Glendon warned, "Someday that truck you hear rumbling down the street might not be the ice cream man." If more than half of commonwealth voters approve of Question 2 on Nov. 6, doctor prescribed death will be legal as of Jan. 1.
In the case of embryonic stem-cell research, the calls for "compassion" ring hollow from researchers who hope to strike gold. "Truth be told, the priorities of researchers often have as much to do with the race for patents and profits as they do with the race for cures of dreaded diseases," she said.
Glendon also decried the "veritable tsunami," nation-wide, of attacks on faith communities. Such attacks hit close to home when Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Boston was forced to give up its adoption services in 2006 because the religious organization could not in good conscience place children with same-sex couples.
The focus of Glendon's ire was the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services mandate that requires employers to pay for health care that includes sterilization and abortion-inducing drugs. Churches are exempt, but other conscientious objectors must comply or face crippling fines. The standard religious exemption has been tossed out the window, and in its place is a narrow definition of what constitutes a religious employer, she said.
"We are witnessing an attack on the social institutions that serve as buffers between the individual and the all-powerful state," Glendon warned. Religious providers of education, healthcare and social services will close down or be forced to become tools of the government.
"When the government consolidates a monopoly over those essential services by weakening the intermediate associations of civil societies, they sap the lifeblood of the pro-life movement," she said.
Fortunately, the pro-life movement knows what to do when the going gets tough, she added. Against the "ferocious opposition" of social elites and mainstream media, the movement has managed to make legal advances. There are 29 states that mandate ultrasounds prior to abortions, 29 states sanction informed consent and 26 states require parental notification, including Massachusetts, where MCFL was instrumental in drafting the first law of that kind.
"All of those legal accomplishments are shoehorned into the little space that the Supreme Court has left open for democratic decision-making," she said.
Such laws have "struck fear into the heart of the abortion lobby," she added. "It is the voice of the people that they are beginning to hear, and it is the voice of the people that they most fear."
Anne Fox, president of MCFL, said that the people of Massachusetts are beginning to oppose the most important issue on the state ballot, physician-assisted suicide. The latest polling numbers have Question 2 with 54 percent of the vote, dropping 14 points in a short window. "We are in the game," she said.
Matt Hanafin, member of the MCFL board, encouraged those gathered to do everything possible to defeat physician-assisted suicide. "The day I fear most is not Nov. 6, Election Day, but Wednesday, Nov. 7. That is the morning that we will all have to look at ourselves in the mirror and ask ourselves, 'Did I do enough?'"