Help us expand our reach! Please share this article
There are plenty of good reasons to support boycotts, and over the years, our family has participated in a few. I'm just not sure how mayors of major cities justify attacking a private business simply because its owner chooses to support another private organization with the profits he has earned. The whole thing has been rather strange. One mayor even characterized the company's product as "hate-chicken." Seriously? But there's another question worth asking. Would people who live in Boston, Chicago, and Washington, D.C. really prefer supporting a political agenda to gaining entry level jobs for the teens in their families and neighborhoods? I wonder.
Look, you don't have to agree with what a company does or approve of a brand's line of products. I've never been a fan of Microsoft. You are free to patronize a business or not. I don't go to Starbucks. But a business is also free to run according to whatever principles it sees fit, as long as no law -- and that includes anti-discrimination law -- is broken. Uppity mayors who think otherwise, or who seek to use their positions to harm a private enterprise, are exactly that: uppity. Rejecting an agenda is not equivalent to rejecting the person who promotes it. Opposing gay "marriage" is not an assault on people who identify themselves as gay.