Home » Local »  ‘Sacrosanctum Concilium’ co-author reflects on liturgy 40 years after council

‘Sacrosanctum Concilium’ co-author reflects on liturgy 40 years after council


Belgian Cardinal Godfried Danneels delivers a talk entitled, “The Sacred Liturgy: Revisiting Sacrosanctum Consilium Forty Years After Vatican II” at Boston College April 17. The cardinal is one of the original authors of the which, among other changes, called for the translation of the Mass into the vernacular. Pilot photo/Gregory L. Tracy

Help us expand our reach! Please share this article

CHESTNUT HILL -- God’s people need time to unwind the mystery of the liturgy, both during Mass and over time, said Cardinal Godfried Danneels during a lecture at Boston College April 17.

Cardinal Danneels, the archbishop of Malines-Brussels, helped author “Sacrosanctum Concilium,” which was enacted by the Second Vatican Council and called for the translation of the Mass from Latin to the vernacular. The cardinal spoke at the annual Canisius Lecture, sponsored by BC’s Jesuit Institute and held in Fulton Hall. His talk was entitled, “The Sacred Liturgy: Revisiting ‘Sacrosanctum Consilium’ Forty Years After Vatican II.”

“The liturgy needs time to deliver its riches,” he said to students, faculty and priests.

The faithful need time and space to enter into the event and to leave the chaos of the world behind. In order to do that, they also need silence. The current length of the Mass makes the liturgy an “unstoppable succession of words” with little time for reflection. If the liturgy is too focused on the intellectual, it will fail to reach many of the people who participate in it, he said.

The liturgy also calls for repetition because it reveals its significance over time, he said.

“Our contemporaries often conceive understanding as the ability to grasp something at first hearing,” he said. “Many changes in the liturgy in order to make it understandable have been inefficient because they focus too much on the immediate cognitive informative aspect of understanding. They wanted to explain everything immediately to provide the commentary and to analyze. They never lead to the reality of the liturgy.”

What can be grasped immediately is cognitive understanding, but the divine reality cannot be realized so easily. The realities of love, death and joy cannot be understood all at once upon first inspection, he said.

Cardinal Danneels also spoke about the major changes that the liturgy has undergone in the last 40 years.

“It must be very difficult to imagine for those who have not experienced it for themselves, just how much liturgical practice has changed in the last half century,” he said.

Prior to the reforms of the Second Vatican Council, there was a divide between the priest celebrating the Mass and the faithful gathered, he added.

“It being frequently the case that priests celebrated official liturgy while at one and the same time, the people set about their personal devotions,” he said. “The people assisted, of course, but took little time or little or no part in the liturgy itself.”

The aim of the liturgical movement, which originated in Belgium, was to initiate active participation for lay people. With the use of the vernacular, the Mass became more transparent. However, problems still existed, he said.

Not only the language, but the content was unfamiliar. The Bible uses language from a “bygone era.” Verses speak of shepherds and their flocks, which are no longer realities of daily life, he said.

Rather than change the symbols used in texts, the symbols must be explained within their historical context. In the same way, words like Easter, resurrection and the Eucharist cannot be replaced. They, like some words in the liturgy, must be learned, he said.

Since Christian liturgy cannot be known from human experience alone, it demands catechesis. The instruction must be done outside of the liturgy so that participants can experience the liturgy and then have it explained to them in greater depth, he said.

Although reform was needed to invite the laity into full participation in the liturgy, there can be a “shadow side,” the cardinal added. The changes can lead to a “taking possession of the liturgy,” he said.

“In some cases, this can lead to a sort of liturgical coop in which the sacred is eliminated, the language trivialized and the cult turned into a social event or a piece of theater,” he said.

In these situations, the real subject of liturgy is no longer Christ, he said.

Participants at Mass need to be oriented toward God with an attitude of receptivity, self-giving, praise and prayer. The liturgy is a “loving entering in,” said the cardinal.

At the liturgy’s core is a mystery that must be accepted through openness and faith. It is that mystery that God, through the Catholic Church, offers all people, he added.

“I see even in the secularized world we live in, the attention for liturgy and for symbols is growing and growing and growing,” he said. “Many people are looking for something more profound.”

Rachel Nelson, studying for her doctorate in theology at BC, said she appreciated Cardinal Danneel’s focus on the importance of contemplation and ritual in worship. She said the lecture was “a very nice balance between a kind of hopeful, positive assessment and some critical reflection on some of the difficulties inherent in any radical transformation.”

Help us expand our reach! Please share this article

Submit a Letter to the Editor