A forum of Catholic Thought



Help us expand our reach! Please share this article on social media


Coolest moment in an otherwise uninspired windup to the basketball season came when the Cavaliers valiant superhero, LeBron James, paused before the beginning of Game Three in Cleveland to pay tribute to the incomparable Jim Brown, seated regally at courtside. One found this impromptu moment -- both dramatically subtle and over in a flash -- profoundly poignant.

That's largely because Brown, football's greatest player ever and arguably the greatest athlete in ALL of American Sports History has never begun to receive the accolades he deserves and still has every right to demand, although he doesn't because that's not his style. Never has been.

It remains strange and sad to recall that cool as he was, Jimmy Brown was too hot for America in the fifties and sixties when he was the most dauntless gladiator of our gridiron wars and driving force in the NFL's great leap forward in the culture. It might be different today. Then again, it might not be.

In his classy gesture, LeBron James nicely reminded us of all that. His deep bow to Brown, touchingly both simple and formal, was eloquent. So was Brown's response, a sly smile and casual salute done with an ease bordering on nonchalance and yet strikingly sincere. Jim Brown doesn't play-act. He doesn't showboat. He's a man not of few words but no words. His presence speaks for itself. Everything about him was always totally controlled back when he was totally dominating his primary game (he excelled in four more) and a half century later -- still looking quite Herculean at age 80 -- everything about him still is.

The link between Brown and James was all about both having represented hard-nosed and hard-luck Cleveland in their artistry. It was Brown who last led a team bearing Cleveland's tattered colors to a title when he lugged -- literally on his back -- the underdog Browns all the bloody way, beating Johnny Unitas and the Colts in a championship game that in Cleveland, at least, remains utterly unforgettable given that since that magic moment Cleveland has won nothing in any games their teams dare compete, and that was 51 years ago.

So you can understand that it was being tenderly hoped in Cleveland that maybe this year LeBron James would redeem this woeful ledger even if he had to do it all by himself, which would have been necessary given that the Cavs only other two, faintly starry characters got kayoed by injuries along the way: one in a needless act of thuggery by a Celtics' scrub in the opening playoff round. James is special. But it's a team-game. One-man teams only win in the movies.

That they failed was no dishonor to James. He was wonderful but his team even if it hadn't been battered was no match for the young, swift, and cocky stylists from San Francisco. Doubtless inspired by Brown's presence the Cavs made a brief statement with a thrilling overtime triumph that got the whole town overheated only to get romped and stomped the last three games. In the end, it was humiliating: never in doubt.

Inexplicably, the writers named the Warriors' Andre Iguodala MVP for having -- in their judgement -- done such a fine job guarding LeBron James. In that James in the series averaged "only" a mere 38.5 points per game one finds this a touch baffling. No doubt Andre will have a fine NBA career but LeBron was no less the MVP of this merry fandango.

But then as a casual observer, one finds much about the NBA baffling. The court, designed for men half as big, fast, and skilled is too small. Close and exciting games are ruined -- purged of most of their entertainment value -- by endlessly dreary time-outs. The officiating wavers between the inscrutable and impossible. The Donaghy incident -- the infamous case of the crooked referee never satisfactorily explained -- still hangs over this game, in my book. If there's a game in our jock culture dearly needing to be re-configured it's pro basketball.

All that aside, what most persists about this year's NBA finale is the added grief it brings poor Cleveland. I always root for towns that never win. They have the right to wonder if there's no end to their misery. It's been 51 years since the Browns won. 67 years since the Indians won. They've never won the basketball. Never won hockey, unless in desperation you count attainments of the AHL's long defunct Barons. Never even won in team tennis! Is there no justice?

Of course, Cleveland is hardly the only town thus afflicted. In Milwaukee, the Bucks haven't won since Abdul Jabbar called himself Lew Alcindor. When will Memphis sip champagne, or Toronto, Salt Lake City, New Orleans, Sacramento? As Hockey's absolute Mecca, the grievances of Toronto -- sans champion now near a half-century -- are even more sorrowful. There's a fistful of NHL towns from Vancouver to Washington back to Winnipeg that have never known the satisfaction with the Blues and No-Stars scuffing aimlessly near a half century. It is so in every game. Teams move from city to city without breaking the spell. Ask football's Cardinals, last winners seven decades ago when still berthed in Chicago. In baseball, expansion teams routinely wait a half century for fulfillment as the good burghers of Seattle and Houston, San Diego, Tampa and Arlington can grimly attest.

Small wonder the rest of the Republic bristles when New Englanders mope and moan over the stray ins and outs of their four franchises that've collectively eased their pain with "only" nine world championships so far in this very young millennium. The laments of Patriots and Red Sox Nations are particularly irksome. Might we here be spoiled, pray tell? For sure and quite "rottenly" so, the rest of the Nation properly insists. The "Curse of the Bambino" bored reasonable people silly, as now does "the Curse of the Billy Goat" filtering endlessly out of Chicago where the wailing over the mindless Cubs stretches near a century.

Well, for the moment at least Chicago can take solace in its Blackhawks, every bit as beloved there as those ragtag Cubs and more deservingly so. Back in the good old days of the "Original Six" the Hawks were perennial doormats. Now they're being proclaimed "a Dynasty." Three Cups in six years is impressive but it's too early for such talk, methinks.

This is a strong team that's found a way to prevail in a strange NHL interlude when styles and strategies are in transition and there are no great teams. The Hawks have brilliantly managed the salary-cap which has been ruinous to teams like the Bruins and have maneuvered through the parity minefields, player development tangles, and roster shuffling that's bedeviled even historically masterful franchises like the Canadiens and Red Wings while ruining the Leafs.

It was a good year for the NHL with significant advances in profits, ratings, media approval, stature. The league is strengthening, the game growing. The playoffs had stretches of brilliance albeit not as sustained as featured the last three-four years. One sensed a drop-off in the quality of play, especially in the Finals and while the intensity remained striking its furious level also slipped some and I think I know why. The darn season is just too dang long. The playoffs, always grueling, are becoming downright gruesome on top of a six-month regular-season schedule that's unrelentingly brutal.

A superior Tampa offense only scoring once in the last two and a half games was ridiculous. The Hawks aren't that defensively invincible nor do they feature Terry Sawchuk in goal. The Lightening were simply spent, although both teams were on fumes at the end. Knowledgeable observers suggest slightly shortening the playoffs; perhaps knocking rounds one and two down to best three out of five. Might be wise. Something must be done. Two-plus months of playoffs is too long. In the end they become too much wars of attrition, survival mainly of the luckiest. But will management sacrifice the big bucks? Unlikely!

Whatever, it's over. In a span of 24 hours the Warriors and Blackhawks at last bring the winter seasons to a nice and mellow close. And to think, it was only the Ides of June.

Clark Booth is a renowned Boston sports writer and broadcast journalist. He spent much of his long career at Bostonís WCVB-TV Chanel 5 as a correspondent specializing in sports, religion, politics and international affairs.

Help us expand our reach! Please share this article on social media

Recent articles in the Culture & Events section